Reviewer: 280077s Signed [Report This]
Date: April 27 2017 7:16 AM Title: Chapter 1

I hear what you are saying. I just feelike replacing one inbalance with another is not equality in the least bit. I've been seeing a lot of it online withthin recent years, namely scorned women becoming bigoted and hateful of an entire gender due to men in their lives mistreating them, and promoting such bigotry as "feminism". It is not ok. These women have become what they seek to destroy, i.e. bigots.  I feel like if you write stories the way you do, you should not call it "equality".

 

Also, I've been thinking lately, and I've noticed a lot of macrophiles equate increased size with increased worth. I disagree completely, and would argue the opposite. The smaller something is, the more wotrthy of care, empathy and protection. This includes recgnizing the smaller person's rights as a sentient being, and giving them a choice to live their lives, or in some cases die, as they see fit. Self deyermination is slowly becoming my most revered freedom, the freedom to make choices, and not be forced to live or ie because someone else thinks they are looking after your best interest. Most smaller people in macrophilia are essentially slaves in that respect, and I hate that concept. Fetishes should empower you and make you feel good about yourself, not make you feel like dirt because you like to have women talk dirty to you etc.

Even femdom, bdsm, and humiliation fetishes should be and are rooted in a fundemental understanding that the more "powerful" party is responsible for the other and vice versa, responsible for their well being. Thats why aftercare is a thing. 

 

Most macrophile's fetishes seeming to ignore the aspect of aftercare, and see tiny people as not only less than human, but as a means to getting off, nothing more. I have no delusions in saying that how people get off to such things is a mystery to me, and then claim that its about "equality" or even "love". What I described is neither. It is megalomania, abuse of power and a lack of humilty in the face of weilding such power over others. I digress, those are just my personal feelings on most macrophile fetishes.

 

I'm unfortunately a minority that thinks size doesnt necessarily mean increased worth or rights.

 

I got on a tangent, and my thoughts my not be congruent or even be seemingly contradictory at some points, buthonestly I've wrestled with the inconsistencies of this fetish for a while, and come to the conclusion that it is the nature of the fetish. Promoting "equality" an "feminism" through inherent inequality and even bigotry.

Author's Response:

If I had 100,000 fans who were moved as much by my stories as you obviously have been, I'd be rich! Thank you!

I think it's not transferring inferiority to one side, it's giving each sex a new set of advantages and disadvantages. Men are suddenly not as much their own masters. But male loneliness has disappeared. "Forever alone" can't survive in the world of the ROS. Instead of contact with a woman's intimate places being a scarce and (one way or another) costly commodity, it's now a tremendous surplus. It's like the way the green revolution drastically reduced famine. The woman famine for men is over. Virtually all men have a woman who want one, and the size difference makes a relationship with one (much bigger) woman seem like several relationships with (parts of the) woman. Men who might have had trouble asserting themselves or adhering to the social conventions of dating are now as assured of female companionship and sex as are the more attractive, richer, and socially skilled. 

On the other hand, women find that the radical increase in their sex drive, or their lowering of inhibitions, has given them a need that undermines their bargaining positions to an extent. They now are, to at least some extent, responsible for their small lovers. They can shrink any man who isn't taken. But once they take him, he is their responsibility. They may humble him, but cruelty is prohibited, and judgment can be instantaneous. 

Yes men are a means for the women who tower above them to get off! But their smallness now makes them more effective lovers than all but the most skillful and well-endowed men were in the past. They have great value and have the agency to negotiate where they end up. They're going to end up in a woman's panties. no doubt. But they have choices. 

Instead of men making their way through a world defined by the violence of other men, they can make their way through a world defined by the passions and desires of women. It is a much less violent and dangerous world. No men have died in the ROS universe by female violence. Women who have restrained men's freedom are eventually punished. Believe me, these women cherish the pleasure of their tiny men. The very experience of shrinking brings forth awesome emotions in men. They feel desired, much as women at their peak felt before the ROS. Mature women also feel more desirable. 

In some ways men's situation might be worse after the ROS. in some ways it's better. The same for women. Balancing strengths and weaknesses. Women are the outer world, and men's world is inside the underwear of women. Their intimacy gives them a special power that men of the past did not possess. It all (re)balances out. 

 

Reviewer: tuyulboy Signed [Report This]
Date: August 21 2013 1:03 AM Title: Chapter 1

"But you remember how you talked about a guy holding a girl in his arms? That can't happen anymore, but I was thinking, maybe I could invite one of my girlfriends over, and we could strip down and hug and kiss each other, and you could be making love to me down there while her man was taking care of her womanhood." Amber blushed deeply.