[Report This]Date: March 26 2022 2:43 AM Title: Chapter 4: The Conspiracy of Cindy Mitchells
If Officer Cindy Mitchells licked her victim such as the Gryphon and had Potter stuffed in her sweet, oops I mean sweaty butt crack; then shouldn't DNA evidence prove they were / were not her victims?
If so, wouldn't there be residual DNA to prove James Grundy was smashed between another set of breasts? That is of course if all DNA evidence was not washed off and Cindy Mitchells is or is not innocent.
You really have a fantastic story going on here. I love the fact it is more story than simple tiny / GIANTESS; but would love to hear more about what happened between Officer Cindy Mitchells and her former partner Officer Bradley, especially in the toilet room.
Keep up the great work.
Author's Response:
It seems that the people in the police force, at least the important ones like Rachel or the commissioner, are already aware of Cindy's methods. That's why the commissioner gives the case to Cindy; he knows she is a suspect but doesn't want to believe it. Good catch on the DNA, that becomes important later. I would say any DNA caused by breast crushing is minimal, but maybe I'm getting it scientifically wrong lol. Thanks for reading!